{"id":7738,"date":"2017-04-11T20:43:15","date_gmt":"2017-04-11T20:43:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fixmyinfo.com\/?p=7738"},"modified":"2017-07-14T15:56:45","modified_gmt":"2017-07-14T15:56:45","slug":"google-really-keeping-fake-listings-off-google-maps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fixmyinfo.com\/google-really-keeping-fake-listings-off-google-maps\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Google really keeping fake listings off Google Maps?"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Joy Hawkins<\/span>, <\/span>searchengineland.com<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Google announced\u00a0last week<\/a> that they had recently conducted\u00a0a study to research the actors behind fake listings on Google Maps.<\/p>\n The\u00a0study points out that \u201cgeographic proximity is the coin of the emerging localized-search realm,\u201d which matches what I observed with the Possum update<\/a> in 2016. This major algorithm update was responsible for making proximity to the searcher the #1 ranking factor<\/a>\u00a0for local search. This drives up the incentive for companies to create fake listings, since they need more \u201clocations\u201d in order to monopolize the search results and maximize exposure.<\/p>\n There were some things I saw in the study that were very helpful to know:<\/p>\n The study also looked at listings that were suspended due to marketing companies abusing the verification process and obtaining ownership of the listing without the consent of the business owner. This happens a lot in the restaurant industry<\/a>, where marketing companies will create a copy of the business website and put a booking\/ordering link on it, then charge the business owner for all orders placed via their system. They then take ownership of the listing via Google My Business, and the business owner is stuck paying for transactions from any customer finding their local listing on Google. To make matters worse, they refuse to transfer ownership of the listing to the restaurant owner when he finally figures all this out.<\/p>\n When I first read the statement, \u201cOur study shows that fewer than 0.5% of local searches lead to fake listings,\u201d I actually laughed. But then I read the study and began to understand why they came to that conclusion: The study only looked at listings that were suspended.<\/p>\n In collaboration with Google, we examine over a hundred-thousand business listings that appeared on Google Maps between June 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015 and were subsequently suspended for abuse.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n This didn\u2019t look at all the listings the algorithm\u00a0didn\u2019t<\/strong> catch. \u00a0That statistic is not accurate whatsoever as a representation of all searches done on Google. They further state:<\/p>\n In our study, we treat any listing that was in a suspended state at any time as abusive, while we treat all other currently active listings as legitimate.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n If Google\u2019s algorithms were perfect and caught every single fake listing, this would be a good way to approach this. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth.<\/p>\n The study also states that they found 25.7 percent of abusive listings were in the locksmith category. This makes sense, since the algorithmic triggers for a suspension for locksmiths are not the same as for other industries. Google has been much harsher on locksmiths in the last year, and we see way more suspensions<\/a>\u00a0for them on the Google My Business forum. This is really more of an indicator that Google is penalizing locksmiths more than other industries, not necessarily that more spam exists in that industry.<\/p>\n The announcement from Google highlights that they\u2019ve reduced and disabled 85 percent of fake listings before they even appear on Google Maps. That statement is extremely misleading if you don\u2019t realize they\u2019re only referring to listings that Google\u2019s algorithm actually caught<\/em>, and in those cases, only 15 percent of the listings were live on Google Maps\u00a0before<\/em> getting suspended. It does\u00a0not<\/strong> mean that Google actually catches 85 percent of fake listings.<\/p>\n I agree that Google\u2019s algorithms are getting smarter and better at catching spam. Nevertheless, here are the major issues with Maps spam that this study didn\u2019t address.<\/p>\n The Google My Business phone support team seemingly\u00a0lacks the ability to understand what spam is and how to detect it.\u00a0I had a recent case of an attorney that I brought up to Google. This guy has over 20 fake listings at addresses that he rents via virtual office providers. They are all listed as open during regular business hours, and many of them aren\u2019t within driving distance of one\u00a0other. (In other words, you\u2019d have to hop on a plane to get from one location to another.)<\/p>\n Here\u2019s the kicker: there are exactly two\u00a0lawyers working at this firm. Please tell me how two\u00a0attorneys are able to operate over 20 locations at the same time. This seems like common sense to me, but apparently not to Google, which decided to keep them all active.<\/p>\n Advanced Verification will never solve the problems the algorithm doesn\u2019t catch if the operators looking at the listings don\u2019t know how to tell what\u2019s real vs what\u2019s not<\/a>. It\u2019s only launched in a few areas in California, and yet here are three\u00a0examples from the last month that somehow passed advanced verification and shouldn\u2019t have:<\/p>\n You would think that Google could see this pretty easily, since the mailing services are\u00a0using the exact same address on their listing on Google Maps.<\/p>\n The number of fake listings I see on a regular basis using virtual offices is enormous, and these listings seem to go completely undetected by Google. I\u2019m not sure I\u2019ve ever witnessed a single case where listings got automatically flagged for\u00a0using a virtual office service. Even when they are reported, these types of listings often get reinstated by the Google My Business support team.<\/p>\n This is a\u00a0common pattern I\u2019ve seen on one business that has multiple listings. I had to argue with Google for months last year to get them to remove a listing for a marketing company in Toronto that set up multiple listings in multiple cities using the home addresses of their employees. They kept stating that the listings were legit, even after I called the business and asked for directions to their fake location (the girl on the phone was very confused) to confirm they didn\u2019t exist there.<\/p>\n This has been a spamming strategy that has worked well ever since Google Places first came into existence. There currently is no penalty in place for businesses that\u00a0decide to add extra words to their business name to help with their ranking. Instead, they reap a ranking benefit until someone reports them.<\/p>\n When reported, Google might actually remove the keywords from the title, but then the business owner can just go add them back via the Google My Business dashboard.<\/p>\n The number of fake reviews I\u2019ve seen reported on the forums seems to be on the rise. It\u2019s not just business owners who pay for fake positive reviews, but also people who leave negative reviews for their competitors, like the case that Casey Meraz looked at here<\/a>.<\/p>\n Spammers will upload tons of photos highlighting their services on the listings of their competitors. Tim Capper lists some examples here<\/a>.<\/p>\n I was happy to see Google release information that shows they are aware of some of the issues around Google Maps spam and are doing things to help fix it. However, until they decide to invest more in training and educating their support staff on spam, it seems that the users who attempt to report the spam that the algorithms missed will continue to feel like they are talking to a brick wall.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" By Joy Hawkins, searchengineland.com Google announced\u00a0last week that they had recently conducted\u00a0a study to research the actors behind fake listings on Google Maps. The\u00a0study points out that \u201cgeographic proximity is the coin of the emerging localized-search realm,\u201d which matches what I observed with the Possum update in 2016. This major algorithm update was responsible for … Read moreIs Google really keeping fake listings off Google Maps?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7739,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28,41,22,42,44],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/fixmyinfo.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/direct-1.jpg","yoast_head":"\n\n
\n
\n
1. Google My Business support issues<\/h2>\n
\n
2. Virtual offices<\/h2>\n
3. Multiple listings that are set up using employees\u2019 home addresses<\/h2>\n
4. Keyword stuffing in business names<\/h2>\n
5. Review spam<\/h2>\n
6. Photo spam<\/h2>\n
Final thoughts<\/h2>\n